From the beginning of time people
have always challenged order, rules, and norms when these three things happened
to interfere with the lives of the majority in a negative way. We can see
this happening as early as Socrates, who disobeyed an unjust decree against
teaching his ideas, which led to his being condemned to death; Mahatma Gandhi’s
fight against British rule over India; and Rosa Park’s refusal to give up her
seat on the city bus to make room for more white people, which led to her
arrest. Many philosophers such as Henry David Thoreau have written about the
importance of civil disobedience as well. The most famous of all cases,
however, was the leader of the Civil Rights Movement, Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr. and his fight for civil rights for all people. Civil disobedience, though purposefully
violates one or more of society’s laws, has been and continues to be used successfully to communicate, as well as
change, the unfair, unjust treatment of groups of people within a society in a
non-violent way.
Martin
Luther King, Jr. was one of the twentieth century’s best-known advocates for
nonviolent social change. He believed that there were two types of laws, “just
and unjust laws”, (MLK JR.). In 1963 in, Alabama, King guided peaceful mass
demonstrations that the white police force countered with police dogs and fire
hoses, creating a controversy which created newspaper headlines throughout the
world. Subsequently mass demonstrations in many communities culminated in a
march that attracted more than 250,000 protestors to Washington, DC, where King
delivered his famous “I have a dream” speech in which he envisioned a world
where people were no longer divided by race. So powerful was the movement he
inspired, that Congress enacted the Civil Rights Act in 1964, the same year
King himself was honored with the Nobel Peace Prize. Posthumously awarded the
Presidential Medal of Freedom, King is an icon of the civil rights movement. His
life and work symbolize the quest for equality and nondiscrimination that lies
at the heart of the American and human dream.
Other
important figures of Civil Disobedience include Mohandas K. Gandhi. Mahatmas
Gandhi was the primary leader of India's independence movement and also the
architect of a form of civil disobedience that would influence the world. He
showed the world that there are two ways to fight injustice, the first way is
through violence and aggression the second way is through non-violent resistance.
Gandhi believed, “If you make laws to keep us suppressed in a wrongful manner
and without taking us into confidence, these laws will merely adorn the statute
books”(Gandhi). You see, he fought injustice in a far more discreet way. He
chose to disobey the unfair laws even if it meant being beaten, or thrown in
jail. In 1914, Gandhi returned to India, where he supported the Home Rule
movement, and became leader of the Indian National Congress, advocating a
policy of non-violent non-co-operation to achieve independence. His goal was to
help poor farmers and laborers protest oppressive taxation and discrimination.
He struggled to alleviate poverty, liberate women and put an end to caste
discrimination, with the ultimate objective being self-rule for India. By
gaining many loyal followers the small forms of protest such as refusing to
work, boycotting, or sitting in the street became big enough to move a country
and drive change within its society. Though this isn’t exactly the same as the
civil rights movement of the 1960’s, Gandhi’s cause was similar in that he was
fighting for the rights of his people and his country to gain independence
rather than be discriminated and treated unjustly in their own home.
Civil rights
activist Rosa Parks was born on February 4, 1913, in Tuskegee, Alabama. Her
refusal to surrender her seat to a white passenger on a Montgomery, Alabama bus
acted as a catalyst for a city-wide boycott. The city of Montgomery had no
choice but to lift the law requiring segregation on public buses. Rosa Parks
received many accolades during her lifetime, including the NAACP's highest
award. She didn’t have to fight or hurt anyone in order to have her voice heard
or to have her opinions have an impact on the world. She simply sat where she
wasn’t supposed to, and challenged the forbidden which in turn lifted a law
that had once caused so much separation and hurt among a group of people that
regardless of skin color were just as human as everyone else.
Of course there are instances where
Civil Disobedience does not work. Occupy Wall Street (2011) protested the
crimes against the 99%, caused by Wall Street businessman and banks, including
the loss of homes and jobs of thousands of people and families. Many people
protested by sleeping in tents or rallying together on the streets, and even
though they couldn’t hide from the physical brutality of the police they still
struck a chord within the 99% to come together to try to fight this injustice
peacefully. “Then, on September 17, 2011, a group of (mostly) young adults
decided to take direct action. And this action struck a raw nerve, sending a
shock wave throughout the United States, because what these kids were doing was
what tens of millions of people wished they could do. The people who have lost
their jobs, their homes, their “American dream”—they cathartically cheered on
this ragtag bunch who got right in the face of Wall Street and said, “We’re not
leaving until you give us our country back!”(www.thenation.com). Even though at the end of the day
this was a failed movement in the sense that the people and banks responsible
for the loss of thousands of jobs and homes did not get held responsible for
their actions nor was there any consequence for them, this protest, this
movement, of people who were either directly or indirectly affected in 2007
showed the human spirit and capabilities of a group of people when they come
together to fight for what they believe in and to protest injustice to bring
awareness to issues that affect everyone.
Through the many historical acts of
Civil Disobedience whether old or new, accomplished or unaccomplished, we can
see that civil disobedience is a successful way to communicate issues and fight
injustice in a non-violent way. This is shown through the actions of Martin
Luther King Jr., Mohandas Gandhi, Rosa Parks, and the ninety-nine percent. We
have learned through these acts that it is always worth it to fight for what is
right, and that every voice and every action has the power to motivate masses
of the oppressed to come together and raise awareness as well as find a way to
solve the problem. It is always harder to fight injustice without violence
rather than with it, especially when the suppressed, the discriminated, the
robbed, and the violated have suffered from their adversities through the
piercing of a bullet, the pressure of a hand, or any other form of physical
violence. However when we fight fire with fire not only do we create more fire
but we validate the action of burning bridges, and perpetuate the idea that the
only way to be heard or to get what you want is by physically hurting others
which as history has proven, is not always true.
Enjoyed the essay as it provided historical connections to the prompt to support your point of view. The analysis gives readers a new perspective for those who thought otherwise. Enjoyed the claim and counterclaim as you depicted a two way street. Good job.
ReplyDelete